Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 700 S.W.2d 193
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “evidence of an extraneous offense becomes admissible evidence to prove identity only if there is some distinguishing characteristic or characteristics common to both the primary offense and the extraneous offense.”
  • noting that the trial court has the discretion either to determine the merits of motions concerning the admissibility of evidence during the trial itself or to set a hearing to determine such motions
  • a trial court is not required to conduct a pre-trial hearing, even when it is requested
  • a trial court is not required to conduct a pre-trial hearing, even when it is requested
  • decision not to call witnesses at punishment stage of capital murder trial not ineffective assistance of counsel
  • decision not to call witnesses at punishment stage of capital murder trial not ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Clinton, Onion, McCormick, Miller, Campbell, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.