Skip to main content

Kraft v. State

Citations

  • 603 P.2d 1005
  • 100 Idaho 671
  • 1979 Ida. LEXIS 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If [defendant] chooses to raise the issue on direct appeal and the matter is considered, it becomes res judicata.”
  • where defendant elects to pursue ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal, res judicata may bar reconsideration of issue on post-conviction review
  • former adjudication concludes parties and privies as “to every matter offered and received.”
  • former adjudication concludes parties and privies as \to every matter offered and received.\
  • as stated in Baruth v. Gardner, 110 Idaho 156, 715 P.2d 369 (Ct.App.1986)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes, Maynard, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.