Skip to main content

Schultz v. State

Citations

  • 256 P.3d 791
  • 151 Idaho 383
  • 2011 Ida. App. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that tolling is not allowed for a petitioner’s own inaction
  • holding that tolling is not allowed for a petitioner’s own inaction
  • holding district court did not err in dismissing Schultz’s petition for post-conviction relief because the claim was not raised in the initial petition but only in an amended petition for which Schultz did not obtain permission to file
  • noting petitioner was aware of underlying facts giving rise to claims no later than conclusion of criminal trial and was not prevented from asserting claims any time after judgment of conviction
  • noting petitioner was aware of underlying facts giving rise to claims no later than conclusion of criminal trial and was not prevented from asserting claims any time after judgment of conviction
  • equitable tolling not allowed for petitioner’s own inaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Gratton, Gutierrez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.