· 1/27/2012
Matthew McGrath v. Hillary Clinton
Citations
- 399 U.S. App. D.C. 110
- 666 F.3d 1377
- 2012 WL 247996
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1440
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,407
- 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting Brady’s formulation in a retaliation case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Garland, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.