Skip to main content
· 2/18/2000

McGill, Thu v. Munoz, George

Citations

  • 203 F.3d 843
  • 340 U.S. App. D.C. 185
  • 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 446
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that speculation is not evidence and not sufficient to avoid summary judgment
  • “Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate only if the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom are so one-sided that reasonable men and women could not have reached a verdict in [the non-moving party’s] favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Rogers, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.