Harris v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a gap of five months, when pled alongside allegations that would help rebut “common legitimate reasons for” adverse actions was “enough to survive a motion to dismiss” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• requiring that a Title VII plaintiff allege “facts that, taken as true, render his claim of retaliation [or discrimination] plausible”
• holding allegations sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss where a “five-month time lag” existed
• observing that to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a plaintiff must have “alleged facts that, taken as true, render his claim of retaliation plausible”
• requiring that a Title VII plaintiff allege “facts that, taken as true, render his claim of retaliation [or discrimination] plausible”
• requiring that a Title VII plaintiff 9 allege “facts that, taken as true, render his claim of retaliation [or discrimination] plausible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).