Supreme Court of Vermont· 3/25/1982
State v. Rollins
Citations
- 444 A.2d 884
- 141 Vt. 105
- 1982 Vt. LEXIS 480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no requirement that an expert offer his opinion in terms of absolute certainty.”
- “The content of a breath sample is a physical fact that may give rise to separate, independent inferences, depending upon the level of analysis applied to the sample.”
- “any evidence relevant to whether the [subsequent] reading accurately reflected the defendant’s blood alcohol level at [the time he was driving] was not only admissible, but indispensable to the . . . case”
- “ Tt can well be argued that if a person exhibited no physical signs of intoxication whatever but that the chemical test for alcohol shows a level above .10% that the test was inaccurate.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-06· cited 258×
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 145×
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 92×
- Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-08-07· cited 63×
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-06-06· cited 53×
- State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-07-19· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-09· cited 41×
- State v. KnollIdaho Court of Appeals· 1986-05-01· cited 38×
- State v. DumontSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-08-30· cited 37×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-03· cited 35×
- State v. SenecalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-04-26· cited 34×
- Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-19· cited 31×
- State v. McGowanMontana Supreme Court· 2006-07-19· cited 21×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-07-19· cited 21×
- State v. OrvisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-06· cited 19×
- State v. BusheySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-02-26· cited 19×
- State v. WetzelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1989-12-11· cited 16×
- State v. PlutaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-10-11· cited 13×
- Tyner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-02-05· cited 13×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-03-28· cited 13×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-19· cited 68×
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 63×
- State v. PatnaudeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-03· cited 58×
- Quazzo v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-04-04· cited 46×
- Ackerman v. KogutSupreme Court of Vermont· 1951-10-02· cited 41×
- Denison v. AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-07-09· cited 34×
- Marsigli's Estate v. Granite City Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1964-02-04· cited 24×
- State v. MecierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-02-05· cited 20×
- State v. MillsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-11-14· cited 12×
- State v. BatchelorSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-06-07· cited 12×
- State v. MagoonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1970-04-07· cited 12×
- State v. SwarenginCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-26· cited 9×
- State v. LaFlecheSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.