Skip to main content

Harrell v. State

Citations

  • 725 S.W.2d 208
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • modifying the three-prong predicate due to the nature of the intoxilyzer instrument
  • certification of the equipment falls under the third prong
  • providing predicate for admissibility of breath test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Antonio, Clinton, Davis, Onion, San, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.