Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 342 S.W.3d 565
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 911
  • 2011 WL 2555708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a four- hour window between the earliest time officers could have observed defendant’s conduct and the time warrant was issued did not undermine probable cause for issuance of blood-draw warrant
  • stating that a search warrant may be obtained only after submission of an affidavit setting forth substantial facts establishing probable cause
  • noting that probable cause affidavit did not specifically state time officer made his obsérvations of defendant
  • noting that probable cause affidavit did not specifically state time officer made his observations of defendant
  • directing courts to uphold the magistrate’s probable cause determination if it had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed to issue the warrant
  • stating courts should consider “the totality of the circumstances contained within the four corners of the affidavit” rather than analyze separate statements in the affidavit in isolation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.