Mary Scanlan v. Marshall Eisenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the nature and extent of [the plaintiff’s] interest[,] . . . and therefore[] whether that interest can form the basis of a federal suit, depend[s] on [state] law” (internal citations omitted)
• recognizing the importance of state legislative judg- ments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).