N.D. Illinois· 5/6/2013
Client Funding Solutions Corp. v. Crim
Citations
- 943 F. Supp. 2d 849
- 2013 WL 1883266
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64488
Judges: Dow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1,582×
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 1,257×
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 1,182×
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-04-28· cited 1,016×
- Gayton v. McCoySeventh Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 786×
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court· 1990-05-14· cited 740×
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court· 1830-02-18· cited 609×
- Dowd and Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-13· cited 588×
- Minix v. CanarecciSeventh Circuit· 2010-02-26· cited 508×
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 454×
- Lewis v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2009-04-06· cited 346×
- Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-11-23· cited 331×
- In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSeventh Circuit· 1992-05-22· cited 330×
- Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-15· cited 235×
- United States v. BartlettSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 208×
- Metavante Corp. v. Emigrant Savings BankSeventh Circuit· 2010-08-30· cited 207×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.