Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. v. Jupiter Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[o]rdinarily, an order denying leave to file an amended complaint does not constitute a final judgment notwithstanding a court’s Rule 304(a) finding”
• dismissing appeal on grounds court had no jurisdiction following a dismissal without prejudice
• “An order dismissing an action ‘without prejudice’ is not deemed final for purposes of appeal ***.”
• dismissal under section 2 — 615 may be affirmed on any basis in the record
• “An order dismissing an action ‘without prejudice’ is not deemed final for purposes of appeal.”
• “An order dismissing an action ‘without prejudice’ is not deemed final for purposes of appeal ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).