United States v. $304,980.00 in United States Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that verbal consent was revoked by writing \UNDER PROTEST\ on consent form
• rejecting claim that verbal consent was revoked by writing “UNDER PROTEST” on consent form
• “[W]ithout a case or controversy under Article III, we have no authority to proceed to the merits.”
• “[P]olice officers do not act unreasonably by failing to halt their search every time a consenting suspect equivocates.”
• \[P]olice officers do not act unreasonably by failing to halt their search every time a consenting suspect equivocates.\
• “Put another way, police offic‐ ers do not act unreasonably by failing to halt their search every time a consenting suspect equivocates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).