Hilary Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, at least within the Seventh Circuit, overpayment as an Article III injury has not been extended beyond claims against defective or dangerous products
• holding that both risk of future harm and mitigation damages suffice for standing when a data breach has already occurred
• explaining that federal law does not require credit and debit card companies to reimburse consumers for all fraudulent charges
• complaint adequately alleged injury based on mitigation efforts following breach of card data held by Neiman Marcus chain
• “Where federal subject matter jurisdiction does not exist, federal courts do not have the power to dismiss with prejudice.”
• “Where federal subject matter jurisdiction does not exist, federal courts do not have the power to dismiss with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).