Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/16/1979
Curtis v. State
Citations
- 395 A.2d 464
- 284 Md. 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting the requirement of a “knowing and intelligent” waiver of rights as a statutory bar to post conviction relief
- discussing Supreme Court decisions applying the knowing and voluntary waiver standard
- a defendant may not intelligently and knowingly waive a post conviction claim unless he or she both was previously aware of, and understood, it
- a defendant may not intelligently and knowingly waive a post conviction claim unless he or she both was previously aware of, and understood, it
- The Court of Special Appeals granted leave to appeal and affirmed the Circuit Court’s judgment
- The Court of Special Appeals granted leave to appeal and affirmed the Circuit Court's judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. CorcoranFourth Circuit· 2000-07-19· cited 247×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-28· cited 209×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-07· cited 143×
- Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-11-07· cited 111×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-13· cited 110×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-27· cited 97×
- Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-16· cited 90×
- Palmer v. DermittIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 88×
- Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-03-11· cited 84×
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 84×
- Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-10· cited 81×
- Comptroller of Treasury v. John C. Louis Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-24· cited 77×
- Foster, Evans and Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-03· cited 69×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-27· cited 69×
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.Fourth Circuit· 1993-08-19· cited 66×
- Treece v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-11· cited 61×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-18· cited 61×
- Corey Woodfolk v. Gary MaynardFourth Circuit· 2017-05-23· cited 60×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-04-23· cited 51×
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-19· cited 49×
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Francis v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 650×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 543×
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 532×
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 531×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.