Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/17/1998
State v. Bell
Citations
- 720 A.2d 311
- 351 Md. 709
- 1998 Md. LEXIS 880
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, for the waiver to be made knowingly, the defendant must have some knowledge of the jury trial; full knowledge is not required
- stating that “by declining to adopt the proposed language of the amending bill, the Legislature clearly did not intend” to adopt the result being urged
- stating that “by declining to adopt the proposed language of the amending bill, the Legislature clearly did not intend” to adopt the result being urged
- “Therefore, by declining to adopt the proposed language of the amending bill, the Legislature clearly did not intend” to adopt the result being urged
- ‘Therefore, by declining to adopt the proposed language of the amending bill, the Legislature clearly did not intend’ to adopt the result being urged
- “Therefore, by declining to adopt the proposed language of the amending bill, the Legislature clearly did not intend” to adopt the result being urged
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-16· cited 212×
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-08· cited 120×
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-31· cited 111×
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-13· cited 92×
- Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-12· cited 85×
- Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-10· cited 73×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-28· cited 63×
- In Re Anthony R.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-06· cited 55×
- City of Baltimore Development Corporation v. Carmel Realty AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-03· cited 53×
- Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-11-16· cited 53×
- Andrews & Lawrence v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-28· cited 49×
- Riemer v. Columbia Medical Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-10· cited 45×
- Consolidated Construction Services, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-23· cited 44×
- Nalls & Melvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-04-23· cited 44×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-14· cited 43×
- Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-07-09· cited 43×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-07· cited 35×
- Total Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-25· cited 33×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-12· cited 32×
- Kang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-02· cited 30×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-15· cited 588×
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-26· cited 257×
- United States v. RobertsonTenth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 229×
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 162×
- Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-17· cited 149×
- Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-03-02· cited 148×
- United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonSixth Circuit· 1983-04-04· cited 140×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-28· cited 139×
- Tracey v. TraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-29· cited 134×
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-07-25· cited 115×
- Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-08· cited 107×
- United States v. David CochranNinth Circuit· 1985-09-06· cited 98×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio DUARTE-HIGAREDA, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-05-09· cited 97×
- NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-29· cited 96×
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-20· cited 95×
- People v. TijerinaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-24· cited 92×
- Mauzy v. HornbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-05-03· cited 90×
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-26· cited 84×
- Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-10· cited 81×
- In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-29· cited 80×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.