Andujar-Ruiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate counsel performed deficiently by failing to challenge inaccurate instruction based on 2014 amendments to section 776.012(1) when the earlier version of the statute applied and the error was fundamental
• holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court’s instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error
• holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court's instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error
• citing, inter alia, Little, 111 So.3d at 220-22; Dorsey v. State, 149 So.3d 144, 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).