Skip to main content

Joyner v. State

Citations

  • 41 So. 3d 306
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9882
  • 2010 WL 2671906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Encouraging counsel to invite such error subverts the trial process and is counter to the interests of justice.”
  • “Appellate courts are constrained to-exercise their discretion concerning fundamental error ‘very guardedly’ and ‘only in rare cases’ ” (quoting Fike v. State, 4 So.3d 734, 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009))
  • “Appellate courts are constrained to exercise their discretion concerning fundamental error ‘very guardedly’ and 13 ‘only in rare cases’” (quoting Fike v. State, 4 So. 3d 734, 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hawkes, Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.