Skip to main content

Talley v. State

Citations

  • 106 So. 3d 1015
  • 2013 WL 645911
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that instruction that is incorrect statement of law and misleading to jury, which negates defendant’s only defense, is highly prejudicial to defen dant and requires reversal on direct appeal
  • suggesting that the error in the instructions “may have been harmless” if the prosecutor had not highlighted the error in closing argument
  • suggesting that the error in the instructions “may have been harmless” if the prosecutor had not highlighted the error in closing argument
  • observing that when jurors are faced with both correct and incorrect instructions, there is no reason to believe they will know which is correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd, Khouzam, Larose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.