Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 642 A.2d 1242
  • 1993 Del. Super. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding testimony from officer saying he “would have obtained search warrant” was not enough for application of inevitable discovery where there was no evidence of a process of preparing a warrant
  • finding “ambiguous and equivocal” purported “consent” insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.