Skip to main content
· 11/28/1988

Albury v. State

Citations

  • 551 A.2d 53
  • 1988 Del. LEXIS 378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Delaware law’s interest in “the finality of guilty pleas” is “fundamental” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • setting forth the standard from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • stating that Strickland applies to guilty plea challenges based on an IAC claim
  • “[I]neffectiveness claims alleging a deficiency in . . . performance are subject to a general requirement that the defendant affirmatively prove prejudice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[I]neffectiveness claims alleging a deficiency in . . . performance are subject to a general requirement that the defendant affirmatively prove prejudice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[I]neffectiveness claims alleging a deficiency in . . . performance are subject to a general requirement that the defendant affirmatively prove prejudice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.