Fifth Circuit· 5/20/2021
Maniar v. Garland
Citations
- 998 F.3d 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that a notice to appear which is defective for the purpose of activating the stop time rule still constitutes a charging document vesting jurisdiction with the immigration court
- explaining that Niz-Chavez does not affect its prior holding that an immigration court's jurisdiction is governed by federal regulations and that an NTA without date or time information is sufficient to confer jurisdiction
- confirming that Pierre-Paul’s jurisdictional holding remains good law
- “It is ‘the regulations, not 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Munoz-De Zalaya v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-09-12· cited 55×
- Castillo-Gutierrez v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2022-08-05· cited 53×
- Rodriguez v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2021-09-27· cited 40×
- Paula Osorio Tino v. Merrick B. GarlandEighth Circuit· 2021-09-20· cited 34×
- Garcia v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2022-03-14· cited 21×
- Sustaita-Cordova v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2024-10-31· cited 13×
- United States v. Castillo-MartinezFirst Circuit· 2021-10-27· cited 7×
- Mahm Ibrahim v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2021-12-06· cited 7×
- Alexandre-Matias v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2023-06-13· cited 3×
- ARAMBULA-BRAVOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2021-09-23
- Fuentes-Pineda v. BondiFifth Circuit· 2026-03-24
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 3,361×
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court· 2018-06-21· cited 1,012×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court· 1969-04-28· cited 789×
- Nasrallah v. BarrSupreme Court· 2020-06-01· cited 756×
- Guerrero-Lasprilla v. BarrSupreme Court· 2020-03-23· cited 368×
- Kuang-Te Wang v. AshcroftFifth Circuit· 2001-07-31· cited 334×
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 322×
- Whitfield v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-01-11· cited 237×
- Jordany Pierre-Paul v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GeFifth Circuit· 2019-07-18· cited 204×
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 176×
- Jawaid Anwar v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1997-09-16· cited 136×
- Nehme v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 105×
- Enriquez-Gutierrez v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2010-07-16· cited 82×
- Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1981-05-04· cited 62×
- Esau Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2013-01-17· cited 49×
- Nguhlefeh Njilefac v. GarlandFifth Circuit· 2021-03-24· cited 30×
- Adnan Shroff v. Jefferson Sessions, IIIFifth Circuit· 2018-05-15· cited 17×
- Melida Luna-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty GenFifth Circuit· 2019-07-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.