Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/20/2021

Maniar v. Garland

Citations

  • 998 F.3d 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that a notice to appear which is defective for the purpose of activating the stop time rule still constitutes a charging document vesting jurisdiction with the immigration court
  • explaining that Niz-Chavez does not affect its prior holding that an immigration court's jurisdiction is governed by federal regulations and that an NTA without date or time information is sufficient to confer jurisdiction
  • confirming that Pierre-Paul’s jurisdictional holding remains good law
  • “It is ‘the regulations, not 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.