Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/27/2021

Rodriguez v. Garland

Citations

  • 15 F.4th 351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an alien must receive “notice in accordance with [8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)]” (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii))
  • explaining “Niz Chavez v. Garland made plain that the § 1229(a) notice requirements must be included in a single document”
  • allowing relief following a defective NTA under Niz-Chavez but not Pereira
  • “Under Niz-Chavez’s interpretation of § 1229(a), we . . . require a single document containing the required information in the in absentia context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rodriguez v. Garland

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.