Skip to main content
· 7/31/2001

Kuang-Te Wang v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 260 F.3d 448
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16970
  • 2001 WL 863482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the petitioner did not argue before the BIA in his motion to reopen that \exceptional circumstances\ warranted the exercise of the BIA's sua sponte authority, and therefore holding that this court lacked jurisdiction to consider the issue on appeal
  • noting “alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue when the issue is not raised in the first instance before the BIA—either on direct appeal or in a motion to reopen”
  • a petitioner’s failure to raise an issue before the BIA is a jurisdictional bar to our consideration of the issue
  • “An alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue when the issue is not raised in the first instance before the BIA”.
  • “An alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue when the issue is not raised in the first instance before the BIA—either on direct appeal or in a motion to reopen.”
  • “An alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue when the issue is not raised in the first instance before the BIA— either on direct appeal or in a motion to reopen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.