ARAMBULA-BRAVO

Syllabus

(1) A Notice to Appear that does not specify the time and place of a respondent's initial removal hearing does not deprive the Immigration Judge of jurisdiction over the respondent's removal proceedings. Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), and ‍Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), distinguished Matter of Bermudez-‍Cota, 27 I&N Dec. 441 (BIA 2018), and Matter of Rosales Vargas and Rosales Rosales, 27 I&N Dec. 745 (BIA 2020), followed. (2) A Notice to Appear that lacks the time and place of a respondent's initial removal hearing constitutes a \charging document\ as defined in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.13 (2021), and is sufficient to terminate a noncitizen's grant of parole under 8 C.F.R. § ‍212.5(e)(2)(i) (2021).