Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 12/9/1987

Maki v. United States

Citations

  • 13 Cl. Ct. 779
  • 34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,417
  • 1987 U.S. Claims LEXIS 225
  • 1987 WL 22371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting an identical suspension of work clause to “expressly exclude[] claims for lost ‘profit.’ ”
  • construing an identical contract provision to preclude recovery of lost profits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andewelt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Maki v. United States

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.