Court of Claims· 12/9/1987
Maki v. United States
Citations
- 13 Cl. Ct. 779
- 34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,417
- 1987 U.S. Claims LEXIS 225
- 1987 WL 22371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting an identical suspension of work clause to “expressly exclude[] claims for lost ‘profit.’ ”
- construing an identical contract provision to preclude recovery of lost profits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andewelt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Maki v. United States
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.