Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[m]ere denials or conclusory statements are insufficient” to oppose a motion for summary judgment
• stating that “[m]ere denials or conclusory statements are insufficient” to defeat a motion for summary judgment
• Patent invalid where offer for sale made at time of demonstration using a model which embodied every aspect of the patented product
• immaterial that modifications made in delivered machines because no changes made that concern claim limitations
• in making a determination as to whether genuine issues of material fact exist, the court is not to accept a party’s bare assertion that a fact is in dispute
• mere assertions by counsel that factual issues exist is insufficient to avoid summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).