G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we review adequacy de novo
• stating standard of review and indicating that adequate notice is measured by whether the class as a whole receives adequate notice, not whether all individual class members receive notice
• “[If] the illness was present before the vaccine was administered, logically, the vaccine could not have caused the illness.”
• agency did not err by refusing to consider party’s contention on the basis that it had not participated in prior administrative proceedings
• “In construing claims, this court relies primarily on the 9 claim language, the specification, and the prosecution history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).