Pure Gold, Inc. v. Syntex (u.s.a.), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that certain attor- ney argument was merely conclusory and so did not raise a genuine issue of material fact
• “The non-movant may not rest on its conclusory pleadings but under Rule 56, must set out ... what specific evidence could be offered at trial.”
• “Mere conclusory assertions do not raise a genuine issue of fact.”
• “In countering a motion for summary judgment, more is required than mere assertions of counsel. The non-movant may not rest on its conclusory pleadings but, under Rule 56, must set out … what specific evidence could be offered at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).