Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the party seeking damages bears the burden to establish “the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury”
• holding that “[b]road generalities and inferences to the effect that defendants must have caused some delay and damages because the contract took . . . longer to complete than anticipated are not sufficient”
• stating that a plaintiff asserting a claim for breach of an implied warranty of specifications has the “burden of establishing the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury.”
• stating that a plaintiff asserting a claim for breach of an implied warranty of specifications has the “burden of establishing the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury.”
• stating that a plaintiff asserting a claim for breach of an implied warranty of specifications has the “burden of establishing the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury.”
• stating that a plaintiff asserting a claim for breach of an implied warranty of specifications has the “burden of establishing the fundamental facts of liability, causation, and resultant injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1958-10-08· cited 8×
• Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1958-10-08