Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/27/1992
Lynd v. State
Citations
- 414 S.E.2d 5
- 262 Ga. 58
- 1992 Ga. LEXIS 179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plain error standard proper where no objections made at trial and where enumerations raised for the first time over two months after oral argument
- plain error standard proper where no objections made at trial and where enumerations raised for the first time over two months after oral argument
- a trial court acts within its discretion to require a defendant to accept the appointment of an attorney or to retain a more experienced attorney when the court is concerned about the inexperience of the defendant’s retained attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt, Clarke, Weltner, Bell, Fletcher, Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-11-07· cited 546×
- Wellons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-11-20· cited 105×
- Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 90×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 89×
- Tharpe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-03-17· cited 88×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-11-30· cited 81×
- John Michael Davis v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterEleventh Circuit· 1994-10-21· cited 73×
- Sears v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-15· cited 71×
- Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-02-28· cited 70×
- Braley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-11-12· cited 70×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-06-11· cited 69×
- Eckman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-06-11· cited 62×
- Sallie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-03-24· cited 58×
- Fugate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-06-21· cited 54×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-11-02· cited 49×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-28· cited 46×
- Drug Emporium, Inc. v. PeaksCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-03· cited 40×
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-11-05· cited 40×
- McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-01· cited 34×
- Hittson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-10-31· cited 31×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,063×
- Isaacs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-11-30· cited 201×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-07-16· cited 182×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-02-13· cited 154×
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-11-27· cited 151×
- Childs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-06-18· cited 149×
- Todd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-27· cited 108×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-11-21· cited 100×
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-03-07· cited 90×
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-24· cited 90×
- Putman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-10-18· cited 71×
- Alderman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-02-28· cited 69×
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-06· cited 57×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-06-10· cited 55×
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-06-24· cited 52×
Other cases named Lynd v. State
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.