Braley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was improper for the prosecutor to ask the jurors to “imagine what it was feeling like for [the victim]”
• holding that it was improper for the prosecutor to ask the jurors to “imagine what it was feeling like for [the victim]” (emphasis supplied)
• holding that, “[b]y failing to object at trial, Appellant waived his right to complain that the trial court, sua sponte, excused a prospective juror”
• holding that defendant waived right to complain that trial court excused potential juror for cause sua sponte “[b]y failing to object at trial”
• holding that, “[b]y failing to object at trial, Appellant waived his right to complain that the trial court, sua sponte, excused a prospective juror”
• addressing a “Golden Rule” argument that was not objected to at trial in a death penalty case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).