Indiana Supreme Court· 5/14/2003
Luna v. State
Citations
- 788 N.E.2d 832
- 2003 Ind. LEXIS 409
- 2003 WL 21079651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a person who goes voluntarily for a police interview, receives assurances that he is not under arrest, and leaves after the interview is complete is not in custody simply by virtue of an energetic interrogation
- affirming suppression decision where defendant was told multiple times that he did not have to talk to the police, that he was not under arrest, and that he was free to leave at any time
- “When determining whether a person was in custody or deprived of his freedom, the ultimate inquiry is simply whether there is a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
- “When determining whether a person was in custody or deprived of his freedom, the ultimate inquiry is simply whether there is a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.” (quotations omitted)
- \Nor is the requirement of warnings to be imposed simply because ... the questioned person is one whom the police suspect.\ (quoting Oregon v. Mathiason , 429 U.S. 492 , 495, 97 S.Ct. 711 , 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- Meredith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-05-28· cited 120×
- S.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-08-24· cited 37×
- D.M. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 36×
- Will Thomas v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2017-09-07· cited 33×
- Gauvin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-31· cited 28×
- S.D. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-11-29· cited 25×
- Joseph Matheny v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-03-07· cited 21×
- Sterlen Shane Keller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-04-04· cited 20×
- Brabandt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-27· cited 19×
- Faris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-27· cited 19×
- Laster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-12-22· cited 18×
- Southern v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-19· cited 17×
- State v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-03-12· cited 12×
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-08-22· cited 12×
- Robert E. Hicks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-03-11· cited 11×
- Morris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 10×
- State of Indiana v. Ernesto RuizIndiana Supreme Court· 2019-06-03· cited 10×
- C.L.M. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-03· cited 10×
- McIntosh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-13· cited 8×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Cliver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-05-23· cited 72×
- Dickerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-01-05· cited 70×
- Torres v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-20· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.