Skip to main content
· 1/22/1999

Lujan v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

Citations

  • 165 F.3d 738
  • 1999 A.M.C. 747
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 731
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 609
  • 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 59
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 782
  • 1999 WL 23128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that retail value is not necessarily the appropriate measure of damages in every case
  • concluding that there was an inadequate factual basis for the trial court’s restitution order and remanding for a new restitution hearing
  • concluding that there was an inadequate factual basis for the trial court’s restitution order and remanding for a new restitution hearing
  • holding that where victim was unable to state with certainty which stolen items had been returned to him, and which returned items were in a saleable condition, the evidence was insufficient to support the restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Kozinski, Weiner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.