Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the debtor did not act in bad faith for several reasons, including that the confirmed bankruptcy plan conferred 91% of the benefit to the creditors
• holding that deliberate manipulation could not be inferred from a debtor’s nondisclosure without further support in the record reflecting that the nondisclosure was intended to deceive the court
• stating that doctrine of judicial estoppel is particularly appropriate in situations in which the party ben-efitted from its original position
• concluding that the inference did not apply where the creditors were most.likely unaffected by the failure to disclose, the debtor received no benefit from its non-disclosure, and that there was no evidence that the debtor sought to conceal the claims deliberately
• concluding that the inference did not apply where the creditors were most likely unaffected by the failure to disclose, the debtor received no benefit from its non-disclosure, and that there was no evidence that the debtor sought to conceal the claims deliberately
• concluding that the inference did not apply where the creditors were most likely unaffected by the failure to disclose, the debtor received no benefit from its non-disclosure, and that there was no evidence that the debtor sought to conceal the claims deliberately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).