U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding 10 the reasonableness of an accommodation is ordinarily a question of fact
• “The reasonableness of an accommodation is ordinarily a question of fact.” (quoting Lujan v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 165 F.3d 738, 743 (9th Cir. 1999))
• “UPS concedes that understanding and participating in mandatory departmental meetings are ‘benefits and privileges of employment’ . . . .” (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(1)(iii))
• “An employer is not obligated to provide an employee the accommodation he requests or prefers, the employer need only provide some reasonable accommodation.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Whether a reasonable 1 accommodation exists is ordinarily a question of fact for a jury.” (citing Lujan v. Pac. Mar. 2 Ass’n, 165 F.3d 738, 743 (9th Cir. 1999))
• An employer’s obligation to engage in the interactive process “continues . . . where the employer is aware that the initial accommodation is failing and further accommodation is needed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).