Kathlyn M. Kennedy v. Applause, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “notice of appeal” as to a Rule 11 sanctions 26 order is premature if filed before determination of fees to be awarded
• agreeing with the district court that self-serving, inconsistent deposition testimony did not create a genuine factual dispute capable of defeating a properly supported motion for summary judgment
• finding summary judgment proper, and avoiding judicial estoppel question, where ADA claimant, who had professed to be “totally disabled” for other purposes, resisted summary judgment with deposition testimony that was “uncorroborated and self-serving”
• setting forth elements of a discrimination claim under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).