Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “reducing defendant’s production standards or allowing plaintiffs to move only the lighter loads is more accommodation than is reasonable for this defendant”
• holding under the ADA that an essential function of a job must be actually required of all employees in the particular position
• affirming grant of summary judgment to employer where suggested job alternatives were based only on plaintiffs' conclusory allegations
• affirming grant of summary judgment to employer where suggested job alternatives were based only on plaintiffs’ conclusory allegations
• “Performing the selector job with speed and quality was viewed by [the employer’s] management as essential, and the policy was applied to all selectors.”
• upholding summary judgment for the employer on a discrimination claim under the ADA based on the applicant’s failure to rebut the employer’s evidence involving an inability to satisfy a job requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).