· 2/19/1997
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NY
Citations
- 519 U.S. 357
- 117 S. Ct. 855
- 137 L. Ed. 2d 1
- 1997 U.S. LEXIS 1270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts, when issuing an injunction, must examine the governmental interests involved
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rehnquist, Scalia, Breyer, Kennedy, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.