Jerry Palmer v. Hospital Authority Of Randolph County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district courts have discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after the dismissal of the underlying federal claims
• noting that district courts have discretion to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after the dismissal of the underlying federal claims
• remanding for the district court to consider, in the first instance, whether it had to discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 1367(c) not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims
• applying § 1332(c)(2) without analysis where a plaintiff brought suit in multiple representative capacities, including as the representative of a decedent’s estate
• “[T]he discretionary aspects of the exercise of [supplemental] jurisdiction are best left to the district court in the first instance.”
• “By its language, section 1367(a) authorizes a court to hear supplemental claims to the full extent allowed by the ‘case or controversy’ standard of Article III.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).