Supreme Court· 4/15/1997

Chandler v. Miller

Citations

520 U.S. 305
117 S. Ct. 1295
137 L. Ed. 2d 513
1997 U.S. LEXIS 2505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a concrete special need existed for random drug testing in part because of evidence of drug and alcohol abuse by railroad employees
holding that statute requiring all state office candidates to submit to and pass drug test was unconstitutional
holding that a concrete special need existed for random drug testing in part because of evidence of drug and alcohol abuse by railroad employees
holding that “government-ordered ‘collection and testing of urine’ are “searches under the Fourth Amendment” (citing Skinner, 489 U.S. at 617)
holding that “government-ordered ‘collection and testing of urine’ are “searches under the Fourth Amendment” (citing Skinner, 489 U.S. at 617)
concluding that a Georgia statute that required candidates for public office, including incumbents, to submit to a drug test is an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment because it was not based on an \individualized suspicion of wrongdoing\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rehnquist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

343 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Chandler v. Miller

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.