Skip to main content
· 6/29/1984

L.A. Draper & Son v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., a Corporation Hessco Industrial Supply, Inc., a Corporation Fred Z. Hester, an Individual

Citations

  • 735 F.2d 414
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 733
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “if the federal claims are dismissed prior to trial, Gibbs strongly encourages or even requires dismissal of state claims”
  • “Indeed, if the federal claims are dismissed prior to trial, Gibbs strongly encourages or even requires dismissal of the state claims.”
  • a federal court may exercise pendent jurisdiction over state law claims deriving from a common nucleus of operative fact with a substantial federal claim
  • a federal court may exercise pendent jurisdiction over state law claims deriving from a common nucleus of operative fact with a substantial federal claim
  • “[t]he discretion to entertain or dismiss the pendent state [law] claims continues throughout the proceeding.”
  • “The location and facilities of other producers and distributors are also essential in determin ing the relevant geographic market” and “[p]riee data ... are perhaps the most probative evidence on the relevance of the given market.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Johnson, Anderson, Tuttle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.