Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/26/1986

Luce v. Edelstein

Citations

  • 802 F.2d 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that broad allegations that defendants made misrepresentations to plaintiffs lack the particulars required by Rule 9(b)
  • holding that the plaintiff’s failure to connect allegations of fraudulent representations to particular defendants, attributing representations simply to the “defendants,” could not satisfy Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement
  • holding that generally, plaintiffs must \connect allegations of fraudulent representations to particular defendants\
  • affirming that allegations of mismanagement do not state a claim under Section 10(b); allegations must assert fraud in connection with purchase or sale of securities
  • affirming that fraud claims based solely on factual allegations that lack any “elaboration on what representations . . . were made or why those representations were false” should be dismissed
  • affirming that fraud claims based solely on factual allegations that lack any “elaboration on what representations . . . were made or why those representations were false” should be dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

156 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.