Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the rule is relaxed, “the allegations must then be accompanied by a statement of the facts on which the belief is founded”
• holding that “distorted inferences and 25 speculations” could not meet Rule 9(b)’s requirements
• holding conclusory allegations do not meet the Rule 9(b) standard for specificity on information and belief”
• “the nature and amount of the securities exchanged, . . . the dates of the transaction [must be] disclosed”
• “the nature and amount of the securities exchanged [and] the dates of the transaction [must be] disclosed”
• order dismissing plaintiffs’ fraud count, without prejudice, and denying defendant Everett’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).