Second Circuit· 1/24/1983
Armstrong v. McAlpin
Citations
- 699 F.2d 79
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that substantial assistance may be based on a broker’s processing of fraudulent transactions to generate commissions
- applying New York's statute allowing two years after discovery or six years after accrual, whichever is later
- finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give the plaintiffs’ another attempt to replead their fraud allegations because the complaint dismissed by the court was the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint
- New York's period of six years after accrual or two years after discovery, whichever is longer
- allegations of fraudulent concealment, like allegations of fraud, must satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b)
- investment advisor’s approval of ad-visee’s improper trades was not substantial assistance in the absence of allegation that advisor’s approval was required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eiland, Graaf, Graafeiland, Pollack, Waterman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
231 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Koch v. Christie's International PLCSecond Circuit· 2012-10-04· cited 967×
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Second Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 714×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,922 James Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & FassSecond Circuit· 1985-01-21· cited 289×
- Luce v. EdelsteinSecond Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 234×
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court· 2002-04-09· cited 231×
- Louis S. Caiola v. Citibank, N.A., New YorkSecond Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 195×
- Jensen v. SnellingsFifth Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 185×
- Guilbert v. GardnerSecond Circuit· 2007-03-07· cited 176×
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2003-08-12· cited 171×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1989-12-18· cited 167×
- Dodds v. Cigna Securities, Inc.Second Circuit· 1993-12-14· cited 166×
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersS.D. New York· 1989-08-10· cited 160×
- Armstrong v. McalpinSecond Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 145×
- Russell C. Larson v. Northrop CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-04-29· cited 145×
- John C. Wims v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 139×
- Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-03-19· cited 125×
- Daniel J. Devaney, as Trustee Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Cb & R (Holdings) Ltd. v. A.P. ChesterSecond Circuit· 1987-03-09· cited 123×
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-04-09· cited 119×
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1993-02-11· cited 108×
- Mishal Bin Saud v. The Bank of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1991-04-08· cited 102×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 1,476×
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court· 1879-12-22· cited 715×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedSecond Circuit· 1982-06-03· cited 438×
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Second Circuit· 1978-01-03· cited 315×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,357 Marbury Management, Inc., and Harry Bader, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Alfred Kohn, and Wood, Walker & Co.Second Circuit· 1980-04-21· cited 256×
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court· 1893-05-15· cited 234×
- Michael F. Armstrong v. Clovis McAlpinSecond Circuit· 1980-06-20· cited 221×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,865 James Arneil and Vernon A. Stockwell v. James B. Ramsey, Jr.Second Circuit· 1977-02-16· cited 199×
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationSecond Circuit· 1961-03-10· cited 193×
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedNinth Circuit· 1950-10-26· cited 185×
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndNinth Circuit· 1970-09-04· cited 185×
- Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard CornfeldSecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 179×
- Goldberg v. MeridorSecond Circuit· 1977-09-08· cited 162×
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckSecond Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 148×
- Moscarelli v. StammE.D. New York· 1968-07-22· cited 134×
- Albert v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of MarquetteSupreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 132×
- Margaret Morgan v. Walter G. Koch, Ivan H. Morgan, Morgan Packing Co., Inc., Herman C. Krannert and Inland Container Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1969-12-29· cited 125×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,758 George T. Hupp v. Laurence Gray, an Individual, and A. G. Becker and Company, a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1974-09-13· cited 125×
Other cases named Armstrong v. McAlpin
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.