Skip to main content
· 6/3/1982

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Limited

Citations

  • 681 F.2d 111
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 195
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations concerning violations of general accounting principles do not satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b)
  • holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing plaintiff a third attempt to restate defective fraud allegations
  • holding that allegations concerning violations of general accounting principles do not satisfy the requirements of Rule 9(b)
  • noting that there was “no abuse of discretion in the district court’s refusal to give plaintiff’s attorneys a third attempt to restate the defective allegations” after the Rule 9(b) dismissal
  • dismissing allegations pursuant to Rule 9(b) for alleging contradictory conclusions in the face of irrefutable facts
  • affirming dismissal of all but two securities fraud claims because of insufficient specific allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Timbers, Van Graafei-Land, Van Graafeiland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.