Pasternack v. Shrader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s stock rights plan was not an ERISA pension plan because it did not result in deferred income and did not have the primary purpose of providing retirement income
• determining that plaintiff must satisfy both Rules 15 and 16 to be permitted to amend after the deadline in the scheduling order has passed
• recognizing the general rule in the Second Circuit that amendment will be allowed “in the absence of a showing by the nonmovant of prejudice or bad faith”
• acknowledging that settlements and releases are \designed to 'establish[] a general peace\ (citation omitted)
• noting that a plaintiff who “wishes to amend after the scheduling deadline has passed . . . must satisfy both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15 and 16 to be permitted to amend”
• noting that “no documentation about the [plan’s] terms has been provided beyond the details listed above and those alleged in the consolidated complaint” and declining to resolve the coverage issue “[a]s no further documentation regarding the [plan] is before the Court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carroll v. Trump
  Second Circuit· 2023-12-13· cited 28×
• Port Auth. Police Benevolent Ass'n, Inc. v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
  S.D. Illinois· 2017-10-24· cited 10×
• United States ex rel. Grubea v. Rosicki, Rosicki & Assocs., P.C.
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-08-14· cited 6×
• SBFO Operator No. 3, LLC v. Onex Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 2024-05-08· cited 6×
• United States v. Amgen, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2018-09-17· cited 3×
• Kocourek v. Shrader
  S.D. Illinois· 2019-06-12· cited 2×
• STATE, COMM'R OF INS. v. CHUR C/W 85728
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-12-23

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 2,369×
• Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon
  Supreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,711×
• Rothman v. Gregor
  Second Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 778×
• Holmes v. Grubman
  Second Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 464×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants
  Second Circuit· 1981-06-22· cited 432×
• Block v. First Blood Associates
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-15· cited 379×
• Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 369×
• AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A.
  Second Circuit· 2010-10-29· cited 287×
• Luce v. Edelstein
  Second Circuit· 1986-09-26· cited 234×
• CTS Corp. v. Waldburger
  Supreme Court· 2014-06-09· cited 210×
• Apotex Inc. v. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2016-05-16· cited 139×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,500 David L. Goodman v. Sidney Epstein
  Seventh Circuit· 1978-09-25· cited 122×
• J. P. Murphy v. Inexco Oil Company, J. P. Murphy v. Inexco Oil Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-02-08· cited 114×
• VACOLD LLC v. Cerami
  Second Circuit· 2008-10-02· cited 106×
• Foster Rich v. Ralph Shrader
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-05-24· cited 52×
• Northwestern National Insurance v. Alberts
  S.D. New York· 1991-07-11· cited 46×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,430 Marion Murtagh and William Joseph Powell v. University Computing Company, a Texas Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-04-03· cited 24×
• Moseman v. Van Leer
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-08-27· cited 9×
• Petro-Ventures, Inc. v. Takessian
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-22· cited 5×