Shekoyan, Vladmir v. Sibley Intl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a pendent state law claim after granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiffs FCA retaliation claim
• concluding that non-resident foreign alien was outside Title VII’s protections even though employer’s hiring decision and subsequent employment decisions about the employee were made within the United States
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a pendent state law claim after granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff’s FCA retaliation claim
• noting that Court “may choose to retain jurisdiction over, or dismiss, pendent state law claims after federal claims are dismissed” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3))
• finding that because of this tolling, dismissal of the pendent state claims “will not adversely impact plaintiffs ability to pursue his District of Columbia claims in the local court system.”
• explaining that the district court alone must decide “[w]hether to retain jurisdiction over [supplemental] state and common law claims after the dismissal of the federal claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).