· 8/2/2007
Lorix v. Crompton Corp.
Citations
- 736 N.W.2d 619
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 444
- 2007 WL 2199236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in a case concerning indirect purchaser standing, finding it “beside the point that, in this case, the price-fixed component may or may not be present in the finished product.”
- describing comparable statutory language in antitrust statute as “apparently limitless”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.