In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that the defendants’ conspiracy affected commerce within Mississippi satisfied requirement that the majority of an antitrust conspiracy occur within the state
• holding that allegations that the defendants’ conspiracy affected commerce within Mississippi satisfied requirement that the majority of an antitrust conspiracy occur within the state
• holding that allegations that the defendants’ conspiracy affected commerce within Mississippi satisfied requirement that the majority of an antitrust conspiracy occur within the state
• finding that indirect purchasers’ allegations that increased costs for the products they did purchase were “traceable” through the chain of distribution “slightly favors standing”
• finding an antitrust injury traceable from a market for GPUs through a market for computers that contain GPUs
• “Once the Court has entered a scheduling order, the liberal policy favoring amendments no longer applies ... [and] any modification must be based on a showing of good cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).